分类导航
争端主题
农产品
飞机
酒精饮料
动物
苹果
石棉
汽车零部件
汽车
汽车皮革
香蕉
电池
牛肉
啤酒
生物柴油
肉鸡产品
黄油
铸铁
水泥
谷物
香烟
咖啡
海关
乳制品
金刚石锯片
钻头
食用油
能源
紧固件
纤维板
飞行管理系统
面粉
鞋类
大蒜
汽油
普遍优惠制
粮食
花生
鲱鱼
生皮
园艺产品
进口许可
进口措施
进口限制
信息技术产品
黄麻包
标签
羊肉
皮革
柠檬
展开
高级搜索
磋商引用协议:
成员国:
争端日期:
争端号:

俄国- 机动车回收费

 

目前状态

已成立专家组,但尚未组成

主要事实

短标题: 俄国-机动车
原告: 欧盟
被告: 俄罗斯
第三方: 巴西;中国;印度;日本;韩国;挪威;乌克兰;美国
引用协议:
(磋商请求中引用)
GATT 1994 Art. I1, II1(a), II1(b), III2, III4Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs) Art. 2.1, 2.2
收到磋商请求:
提交专家组报告:
提交上诉机构报告:

争端总结更新日期

The summary below was up-to-date at 12 December 2013

磋商

Complaint by the European Union. (See also DS463)

On 9 July 2013, the European Union requested consultations with the Russian Federation regarding Russia's measures relating to a charge, the so‑called “recycling fee”, imposed on motor vehicles.

The legal instruments cited by the European Union include:

  • Federal Law No. 89-FZ on production and consumption wastes, as amended by Federal Law No. 128-FZ; and,
     
  • Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 870 of 30 August 2012 on recycling fee for wheeled transport vehicles.

According to the European Union, the Russian Federation imposes the recycling fee only on imported motor vehicles. Under certain conditions, domestic vehicles, as well as vehicles imported from Belarus and Kazakhstan, are exempted from the fee. In contrast, there is no exemption from the fee for vehicles imported from the European Union.

The European Union also argues that the structure of the recycling fee has a detrimental impact on imported vehicles as compared with relevant domestic vehicles, because the fee is progressive and differentiates between “new vehicles” and “vehicles produced more than 3 years ago”.

The European Union claims that the measures appear to be inconsistent with:

  • Articles I:1, II:1(a), II:1(b), III:2 and III:4 of the GATT 1994; and
     
  • Article 2.1 and 2.2 of the TRIMs Agreement.

On 18 July 2013, the United States requested to join the consultations. On 19 July 2013, China and Japan requested to join the consultations. On 22 July 2013, Turkey and Ukraine requested to join the consultations.  Subsequently, the Russian Federation informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of China, Japan, Turkey, Ukraine and the United States to join the consultations.

On 11 October 2013, the European Union requested the establishment of a panel.  At its meeting on 22 October 2013, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.

 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At its meeting on 25 November 2013, the DSB established a panel. China, India, Japan, Korea, Norway, Turkey, Ukraine and the United States reserved their third-party rights.  Subsequently, Brazil reserved its third-party rights.