分类导航
争端主题
农产品
飞机
酒精饮料
动物
苹果
石棉
汽车零部件
汽车
汽车皮革
香蕉
电池
牛肉
啤酒
生物柴油
肉鸡产品
黄油
铸铁
水泥
谷物
香烟
咖啡
海关
乳制品
金刚石锯片
钻头
食用油
能源
紧固件
纤维板
飞行管理系统
面粉
鞋类
大蒜
汽油
普遍优惠制
粮食
花生
鲱鱼
生皮
园艺产品
进口许可
进口措施
进口限制
信息技术产品
黄麻包
标签
羊肉
皮革
柠檬
展开
高级搜索
磋商引用协议:
成员国:
争端日期:
争端号:

阿根廷-阿根廷-关于应用于烟制品及包装的商标、地理标识、其它普通包装要求的某些措施

 

目前状态

磋商中

主要事实

短标题:
原告: 古巴
被告: 澳大利亚
第三方:
引用协议:
(磋商请求中引用)
GATT 1994 Art. III4, IXTechnical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Art. 2.1, 2.2Intellectual Property (TRIPS) Art. 3.1, 15.4, 16.1, 20, 22.2(b), 24.3
收到磋商请求:
提交专家组报告:
提交上诉机构报告:

争端总结更新日期

The summary below was up-to-date at 10 July 2013

磋商

Complaint by Cuba. (See also DS434, DS435, DS441 and DS467)

On 3 May 2013, Cuba requested consultations with Australia concerning certain Australian laws and regulations that allegedly impose trademark restrictions and other plain-packaging requirements on tobacco products.

Cuba challenges the following measures:

  • The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011, Act No. 148 of 2011, “An Act to discourage the use of tobacco products, and for related purposes”;
     
  • The Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations 2011 (Select Legislative Instrument 2011, No. 263), as amended by the Tobacco Plain Packaging Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) (Select Legislative Instrument 2012, No. 29) (“the Regulations”);
     
  • The Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Act 2011. Act No. 149 of 2011, “An Act to amend the Trade Marks Act 1995, and for related purposes”; and
     
  • Any related measures adopted by Australia, including measures that implement, complement or add to these laws and regulations, as well as any measures that amend or replace these laws and regulations.

Cuba claims that Australia's measures appear to be inconsistent with Australia's obligations under:

  • Articles 2.1, 3.1, 15.4, 16.1, 20, 22.2(b) and 24.3 of the TRIPS Agreement;
     
  • Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the TBT Agreement; and
     
  • Articles III:4 and IX:4 of the GATT 1994.

On 8 May 2013, Canada and New Zealand requested to join the consultations. On 13 May 2013, Honduras and Norway requested to join the consultations. On 14 May 2013, Ukraine requested to join the consultations.  On 16 May 2013, the European Union requested to join the consultations.  On 17 May 2013, Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Uruguay requested to join the consultations. Subsequently, Australia informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of Brazil, Canada, the Dominican Republic, the European Union, Guatemala, Honduras, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Ukraine and Uruguay to join the consultations.

On 4 April 2014, Cuba requested the establishment of a panel.

 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At its meeting on 25 April 2014, the DSB established a panel. Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, the Dominican Republic, the European Union, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, the Philippines, Russia, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, the United States, Uruguay and Zimbabwe reserved their third-party rights. Subsequently, Indonesia, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, South Africa and Peru reserved their third-party rights.

On 25 April 2014, Australia requested the Director-General to compose the panel. On 5 May 2014, the Director-General composed the panel.