Menu
WTO News
WTO Cases And Documents
Foreign Trade Laws
 Classifications
Subject
Agricultural Products
Aircraft
Alcoholic Beverages
Animals
Apples
Asbestos
Automobile Parts
Automotive
Automotive Leather
Bananas
Batteries
Beef
Beer
Biodiesels
Broiler Products
Butter
Cast Iron
Cement
Cereals
Cigarettes
Coffee
Customs
Dairy Products
Diamond Sawblade
Drill Bits
Edible Oils
Energy
Fasteners
Fibreboard
Fish
Flight Management System
Flour
Footwear
Garlic
Gasoline
General System of Preferences
Grain
Groundnuts
Herring
Hides and Skins
Horticultural Products
Import Licensing
Import Measures
Import Restrictions
Information Technology Products
Jute Bags
Labelling
Lamb
Leather
Lemons
Matches
Meat
Minimum Import Prices
Olive Oil
Orange Juice
Packaging
Paper
Pasta
Periodicals
Pet Food
Photographic Film and Paper
reverl all
Advanced search
Agreement:
Member:
 
Year:
To
Dispute number:

China — Measures Imposing Anti-Dumping Duties on High-Performance Stainless Steel Seamless Tubes (“HP-SSST”) from Japan

 

Current status

Panel composed

Key facts

Short title: China — HP-SSST (Japan)
Complainant: Japan
Respondent: China
Third Parties: European Union; India; Korea Republic of; Russian Federation; United States; Turkey; Saudi Arabia; Kingdom of
Agreements cited:
(as cited in request for consultations)
Anti-dumping (Article VI of GATT 1994) Art. 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 5.3, 5.8, 6.5, 6.5.1, 6.8, 6.9, 7.4, 12.2, 12.2.2, Annex IIGATT 1994 Art. VI
Request for Consultations received: 20 December 2012
Panel Report circulated:
Appellate Body Report circulated:

Summary of the dispute to date 

The summary below was up-to-date at 8 August 2013

Consultations

Complaint by Japan.

On 20 December 2012, Japan requested consultations with China concerning measures imposing anti-dumping duties on high-performance stainless steel seamless tubes (“HP-SSST”) from Japan, as set forth in Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China (“MOFCOM”) Notice No. 21 [2012] and Notice No. 72 [2012], including any and all annexes and any amendments thereof.

Japan claims that the measures are inconsistent with:

  • Articles 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 5.3, 5.8, 6.5, 6.5.1, 6.8, 6.9, 7.4, 12.2 and 12.2.2 of the Anti‑Dumping Agreement; and
     
  • Article VI of the GATT 1994.

On 15 January 2013, the European Union requested to join the consultations.  Subsequently, China informed the DSB that it had accepted the request of the European Union to join the consultations. On 11 April 2013, Japan requested the establishment of a panel.  At its meeting on 24 April 2013, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.

 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At its meeting on 24 May 2013, the DSB established a panel.  The European Union, India, Korea, the Russian Federation, and the United States reserved their third party rights.  Subsequently, Saudi Arabia and Turkey reserved their third party rights. On 17 July 2013, Japan requested the Director‑General to compose the panel. On 29 July 2013, the Director-General composed the panel.